Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge preço, características e especificações Samsung Galaxy supera o iPhone da Apple vendas. Galaxy S7 EUA bate os envios do iPhone 6 no mercado americano. O novo Samsung Galaxy S7 lançado em fevereiro deste ano ao lado da borda Galaxy S7 Aqui nós arredondar todas as últimas Notícias sobre o Samsung Galaxy S7, incluindo data de lançamento, preço, rumores e features. Samsung Galaxy S7 e Galaxy S7 borda em um glance. Samsung Galaxy S7 e Galaxy S7 data de lançamento de borda 21 fevereiro. Galaxy S7 e S7 borda à venda no UK 11 março. Galaxy S7 preço do Reino Unido a partir de 599 IVA incluído. Galaxy S7 preço borda de 639 IVA inc. Samsung Galaxy S7 últimas news.15 07 2016 Samsung s envios smartphone ter ultrapassado o iPhone nos EUA, graças a fortes vendas do Galaxy S7.According a pesquisa do painel do mundo de Kantor, nos três meses até maio deste ano, Samsung representou 37 por cento de vendas do smartphone e 29 por cento de Apple. Entretanto, entre telefones da capitânia, era uma chamada mais próxima com o galáxia S7 S7 Contabilidade de bordas para 16 por cento das vendas eo iPhone 6s 6s Plus em 14 6 por cento. A pesquisa também descobriu que apenas cinco por cento das compras da Samsung veio daqueles que se deslocam da Apple, enquanto 14 por cento dos compradores da Apple se mudou da Samsung. No Reino Unido, É uma coisa mais próxima, com cada um deles representando 36 por cento das vendas neste mercado.11 07 2016 Samsung s robusto Galaxy S7 modelo ativo falhou um teste de resistência à água, apesar de segurar uma classificação de resistência à água IP68.Esta certificação supostamente garante um dispositivo Pode sobreviver a imersão total em até cinco pés de água por até 30 minutos, mas o S7 Active não conseguiu viver de acordo com estas alegações quando submetido a ensaios por produto de testes organização Consumer Reports. After ser colocado em um tanque pressurizado para o equivalente a Cinco pés de água por 30 minutos, o visor tornou-se obscurecido por linhas verdes, com bolhas de umidade visíveis dentro de ambas as lentes de câmera, o grupo said. After o primeiro dispositivo falhou, os técnicos apresentaram uma segunda unidade para o mesmo te St O segundo dispositivo também falhou, sem nenhum modelo retornando à funcionalidade completa. O Samsung Galaxy S7 dispositivo ativo é um dos telefones mais resistentes até à data e é altamente resistente a arranhões e IP68 certificado, a empresa disse em uma declaração para Consumer Reports, mas admitiu que pode haver uma chance de que um dispositivo defeituoso não é Como estanque como deveria ser, e disse que está investigando o assunto. A impermeabilização tem sido um ponto de venda importante da Samsung Galaxy S gama, em especial depois que foi reintegrado para a última geração É uma característica particularmente importante do S7 Active, Como ele é projetado para uso em ambientes rudes, ao ar livre. Relatórios do consumidor observou que de todos os modelos Galaxy S7 atual, o S7 Active foi o único a falhar o seu teste de imersão, com o S7 eo S7 Edge passando.28 06 2016 A Samsung está programada para lançar uma edição limitada do Galaxy S7 Edge em tempo para os Jogos Olímpicos de 2016 que acontecerão no Brasil no próximo mês, relatórios da Trusted Reviews. Uma imagem alegadamente mostrando as novas edições foi vazada por Evle Blass evleaks, com os telefones Mostrando o logotipo dos anéis olímpicos no fundo da retaguarda, juntamente com ouro azul detalhando em torno do botão de casa, fone de ouvido e módulo de câmera. Como o relatório observa, o revelar foi previamente previsto pela SamMobile baseado em Samsung anterior Olympics tie-in wiht com o Galaxy S line.08 06 2016 O Samsung Galaxy S7 acabou de receber uma nova adição, sob a forma do Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Para aqueles que não se deparam com a linha da Samsung s Active, eles re versões reforçadas de sua linha de capitânia, projetado para Para ser usado em todos os climas e ambientes. Isso significa que, além do S7 s IP68 regular água e à prova de poeira, o S7 ativo também vem com uma armação de borracha reforçada, que s drop-proof a uma altura de cinco metros A tela também é supostamente à prova de quebra, embora nós wouldn t necessariamente quer testar isso out. The maior atualização, no entanto, é para a bateria A bateria S7 Active s é um terço maior do que o padrão S7, trazendo sua capacidade total para 4.000mAh Isso significa que não só você pode levá-lo caiaque ou caí-lo para baixo uma ravina, o S7 Active é capaz de alimentar pelo menos um dia inteiro no deserto. Há um pequeno problema, no entanto - só está disponível na América e Somente através da operadora de rede AT T A Samsung não revelou quando ou se o S7 Active estará chegando a outros territórios, mas com base nas vendas precárias de dispositivos ativos anteriores, ficamos surpresos se ele chegou à Europa.02 06 2016 Samsung tem Anunciou uma nova versão inspirada no Batman do Galaxy S7 Edge Dublou a edição Injustice, o telefone vem em preto com aparamentos de ouro Há ainda um símbolo Batman na parte traseira. Em um vídeo unboxing o telefone vem com fones de ouvido, um Batman armour - Estilo e um fone de ouvido de realidade virtual A interface do usuário foi alterado um pouco para dar-lhe mais de um tema Batman TI também parece incluir um jogo de vídeo com o super-herói Gotham. O telefone comemora o terceiro aniversário do celular popular Game, Injustice Gods Among Us O jogo apresenta um mecânico de cartas colecionáveis e envolve os jogadores em 3-em-3 tag equipe de combate que apresentam muitos dos personagens DC mais icônicos. O telefone estará disponível a partir de 13 de junho Nenhum preço foi definido para o Smartphone Ele aparecerá exclusivamente em territórios selecionados, incluindo China, Cingapura, Coréia, América Latina e Rússia Atualmente, não há nenhuma palavra sobre um lançamento no Reino Unido.17 05 2016 A Samsung oferecerá aos novos clientes Galaxy S7 e S7 um exclusivo pacote de conteúdo Gear VR, O que significa que eles podem obter as mãos sobre o fone de ouvido Samsung Gear VR para um preço com desconto, juntamente com um pacote gratuito de jogos e experiências para aproveitar ao máximo o fone de ouvido realidade virtual. Conteúdo incluído no pacote é Anshar Wars 2, Darknet, Drift, Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes, Ocean Rift e Starchart, embora nem a Oculus nem a Samsung tenham anunciado o quanto o preço com desconto vai economizar os clientes no preço de varejo. Nossa galáxia S7 e S7 borda estão executando extremamente bem, demonstrando a demanda contínua forte para nossos dispositivos superiores da capitânia, David Lowes, diretor de marketing da Samsung Electronics Europe, disse. O smartphone já é tão fundamental para nossas vidas, mas conectá-lo com um produto como o Gear VR abre novas experiências incríveis que são muitas vezes tão emocional como eles são imersivos Com este novo incentivo, estamos encorajando adopção mais ampla VR para que mais pessoas podem experimentar Esta surpreendente nova tecnologia para si. A Samsung vendeu 300.000 fones de ouvido Gear VR na Europa até agora este ano, com o mercado de realidade virtual definido para crescer 168 por cento ano-a-ano em 2016 de acordo com CCS Insight. Na Oculus, queremos que as pessoas experimentem qualquer coisa, em qualquer lugar através do poder da realidade virtual e estamos começando a ver isso acontecer com a Gear VR, disse Max Cohen, Chefe da Mobile da Oculus Together, o hardware e software fornecem a melhor experiência absoluta de VR No celular disponível hoje e estamos ansiosos para continuar a excitar e envolver os consumidores europeus.13 05 2016 O Samsung Galaxy S7 e S7 Edge estão definidos para liderar o mercado de smartphones dos EUA no segundo trimestre de 2016, de acordo com novos dados. Kantar Worldpanel Lançou dados destacando o sucesso contínuo do Samsung Galaxy S7, que representou quase 6 por cento das vendas de smartphones nos EUA durante o primeiro trimestre, apesar de apenas ser lançado em 11 de março. Isso faz com que o S7 e S7 Edge o quinto mais vendido Smartphone durante este período, e Samsung s ranking está definido para subir ainda maior no segundo trimestre. Entre aqueles que compraram o dispositivo em março, a vida da bateria, qualidade da câmera, capacidade de armazenamento e processamento Velocidade foram todos fortemente citados como incentives.07 04 2016 Samsung espera que as vendas de seu smartphone Galaxy 7 irá alimentar um salto de 10 por cento no lucro operacional para o primeiro trimestre de 2016.The fabricante de telefone sul-coreano prevê seu lucro operacional para chegar a 6 6 trilhões Coreano ganhou 3 9 bilhões entre janeiro e março deste ano, em comparação com seis trilhões de won no mesmo período do ano passado. Ele vem depois do Galaxy S7 lançado no final de fevereiro para boas críticas, incluindo o nosso próprio, com o modelo quebrando recordes em monitores de smartphones, Tais como a exatidão a mais elevada da cor o brilho de pico o mais elevado ea definição de tela a mais elevada. O dispositivo é acreditado extensamente para estar vendendo bem, e Samsung liberará seus primeiros resultados de quarto mais tarde este mês. 04 04 2016 O Samsung Galaxy S7 sofreu um corte de preço de ao redor 150 Nos EUA. Segundo a CNN, o Walmart está realizando uma promoção Rollback nesses aparelhos e 100 em todos os iPhones da Apple até o final de junho. Os descontos aplicam-se ao iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6S, novo SE de quatro polegadas e Samsung Galaxy 6 e 7.01 04 2016 A data de lançamento para um dos principais concorrentes do Galaxy S7 - o HTC 10 provavelmente - foi anunciado como terça-feira, 12 de abril. Há uma transmissão ao vivo a decorrer às 13:00 Tempo de Londres para o dispositivo, que poderia ser chamado de HTC 10 ou HTC One M10, dependendo de qual rumor você ouvir. Leaks sugerem que o HTC 10 terá um design novo chassi, 5 1in tela de resolução 2K suportando Super LCD, não AMOLED, Uma câmera traseira de 12 megapixels e vêm em uma variedade de cores dentro, é esperado que apresentam um processador Snapdragon 820, 4GB de RAM, 32GB de memória interna com suporte microSD e uma bateria de 3.000mAh. Com um lançamento antecipado de maio, após a abril Anúncio, a HTC está muito atrasado no lançamento de um novo telefone este ano, com rivais LG e Samsung - e até mesmo Apple - já tendo lançado aparelhos em 2016. No papel, essas especificações também são bastante semelhantes ao Galaxy S7, do tamanho da tela para o armazenamento Especificações da câmera, para que a HTC precise Algo muito especial, a fim de competir. Post navegação. Galaxy S7 sistema usa até 8GB fora da caixa, mas você pode mover aplicativos para SD. Remember que fedor grande que foi feito sobre a Samsung não permitindo para Android 6 0 Marshmallow s recurso de armazenamento adotável Bem, isso é direito aqui é porque as pessoas jogaram um pouco de um ajuste Fora da caixa, o Samsung Galaxy S7 usa até 8GB do telefone s 32GB para aplicativos de sistema e TouchWiz e tudo o mais Samsung pré-carregado That sa trimestre de todos Do seu armazenamento interno, para colocá-lo de outra forma Isso não é bom. Como você pode ver a partir da imagem acima, antes mesmo de concluir a instalação no meu Galaxy S7 nós unboxed-lo aqui, eu estava em torno de metade do meu armazenamento de 32 GB disponível A imagem mostra que eu usei menos de 16GB total, mas eu ainda estou instalando aplicativos e já saltou após a marca de meio caminho e agora tem cerca de 15GB para usar Se eu fosse um proprietário de smartphone típico que mantém um telefone por dois anos, 15GB isn t deixando-me muito espaço para instalar aplicativos para. As pessoas estavam reclamando sobre a falta de armazenamento adotável, porque eles assumiram que os instaladores de aplicativos pesados rapidamente ficar sem espaço para instalar mais aplicativos Se você olhar para a minha situação, que poderia acontecer facilmente No entanto, após cavar em torno das configurações de armazenamento do Galaxy S7, notei que a Samsung ainda está permitindo que você mova aplicativos para cartões SD, assim como eles fizeram no passado Dê uma olhada. Eu corri através deste processo com uma série de aplicativos que eu instalei através do Google Play que weren t sistema Apps De jogos para aplicativos de companhias aéreas para o Google Analytics eles todos me deixam movê-los para o meu SD de 200GB Se eu rasguei o cartão SD, ele tirou todos esses aplicativos e disse que eles estavam ligados ao cartão SD Isso é um pouco surpreendente, Moto X Pure Edition não permite que você faça isso Veja por si mesmo aqui. Assim, a Samsung pode usar até 8GB de espaço para aplicativos e serviços do sistema, mas eles ainda estão permitindo que você mova os aplicativos para um cartão SD para liberar espaço no Partição interna Isso é um bom sinal , Especialmente desde que você pode colocar até 200GB cartões SD no S7 ou S7 Edge E agora pode ser um bom momento para comprar este microSD SanDisk de 200GB da Amazon. Feeling melhor sobre a situação storage. ADDITIONAL COVERAGE. Post navegação. Tenho um Um problema ligeiramente diferente Eu comprei um SD de 64 GB, mas o meu menu de armazenamento não parece que me permite mover qualquer apps para ele Eu não tenho uma tela como a mostrada acima e não consigo encontrar em qualquer lugar nos vários menus onde essa opção É oferecido Isso praticamente torna o telefone inútil para mim Sem dúvida é que eu não conseguir encontrar algo bem na minha frente você deve me ver em uma loja de ferragens, mas possivelmente não Qualquer sugestões lá fora Eu não estou tendo sorte com a mudança de vontade Demorar alguns minutos 10 minutos. Infelizmente parece um monte de jogos VR e aplicativos vão direto para armazenamento interno e muitos deles não podem ser movidos para que a Samsung parecem ter atirado seus planos de dominação VR mundo no pé omitido storage. I adaptável Tão preso eu tenho o Galax Y S7 Edge com um cartão SD Samsung de 128 GB inserido Eu formatei o cartão SD enquanto ele está no telefone e tentei mover os aplicativos, mas o telefone está agindo como se o cartão SD não estivesse inserido. Meus aplicativos têm o ícone do cartão SD transparente. O telefone mostra quando você remove o cartão SD depois de mover seus apps mais Qualquer dicas. Eu consegui mover um monte de meus aplicativos para o SD, mas por algum motivo eu não posso ver os arquivos no explorador e meu armazenamento não é mostrado com precisão Ele ainda Mostra que há apenas 2gb usado no meu SD, embora eu ve transferidos cerca de 6GB de valor do material através do Gerenciador de aplicativos que eu reiniciei o telefone também Isso é normal ou fez algo errado. Eu fiquei muito decepcionado ao descobrir que eles desativaram esse recurso Permitir o SD para ser montado como armazenamento interno resolve os seguintes problemas.1 Nem todos os aplicativos podem ser movidos para SD você está à mercê do desenvolvedor 2 Mesmo quando os aplicativos podem ser movidos para o SD muitas vezes eles são apenas parcialmente movido alguns dos aplicativos Reside no SD e alguns em memória interna Y 3 Cache Cresce e cresce Aplicativos como Pinterest usam GB s de cache É um duplo whammy Sim, o cache foi apagado, mas isso derrota a finalidade de um cache 4 Em quase todos os casos, depois de uma aplicação atualizar e alguns aplicativos atualizar com freqüência ele se move para trás Para o armazenamento interno em que ponto você deve movê-lo manualmente de volta para o SD Isso pode ser muito tedioso e demorado, dependendo do número de apps É um loop. i vicioso só tenho a minha nova borda s7 parece que um monte de meus aplicativos Não me oferecem a opção de passar para externo e im já em 32 no meu interno não tão feliz qualquer help. Well 8gb é um passo na direção certa Eu acho que o meu s6 tinha 22 23 disponíveis a partir de uma ardósia limpa Mas isso é o que acontece quando Você começa uma portadora de marca device. I pensar que enquanto ele é bom que ainda permitem que o App2sd, mas os geeks podem saber como fazer isso, mas o consumidor geral terá de idéia como fazer isso A quantidade de armazenamento deixado é ridiculous.15gb esquerda é Diminutivo estes dias com todos os jogos app e muitos têm g Otten maior em tamanho Sempre parece que eles obtêm algo certo e, em seguida, parafuso em outro lugar Eu estou supondo que a razão que eles foram com o 32gb foi para manter o custo do telefone para baixo. Samsung fornece outro motivo pelo qual 16GB nunca deve descrever a capacidade de armazenamento Do seu telefone neste dia e idade Ele só deve ser usado para descrever a quantidade de RAM em seu computador. Então me diga novamente Por que eles removerem o armazenamento adotable eu entenderia se houvesse problemas de incompatibilidade ou problemas de diferença de velocidade entre o ufs eo SD Cartão, mas isso, eles deixam esta característica ficar Esta é basicamente uma versão meio ass de armazenamento adotável Mesmo HTC A9 deixou o recurso como é Por que remover um entusiasta livre friendly feature. I não lembro o motivo exato, mas Samsung e LG têm Ambos afirmaram que não queriam desativar o armazenamento adotável, mas a maneira como o Google implementou tornou muito de um aborrecimento ou impossível deixá-lo habilitado Eu não sei se isso é verdade ou não, mas parece legítimo desde LG um Samsung disse que a mesma coisa que eu não vejo qualquer benefício para eles desativá-lo, por isso seria lógico que eles fizeram isso só porque eles tinham. Porque se você instalar um cartão sd e usar o armazenamento adotável, ele formata o cartão. Ser toneladas de pessoas atirando cartões com fotos existentes, documentos pessoais, etc e inadvertidamente excluí-los Então acho que fica com a culpa Samsung ou LG, e não Google S7 ambos optaram para fora de que o apoio de relações públicas nightmare. OK sim que eu entendo, Não é como um recurso de formato automático É uma opção de usuário para deixá-lo como é ou combinar armazenamento Ocultar-lo em opções de desenvolvedor ou algo Provavelmente wouldn t ativar ou mexer com o recurso se você didn t sabe o que faz Como eu disse HTC tem em O A9 nenhum problema, o menor das 3 companies. Also eu tenho certeza que teria de pedir-lhe para apagar o cartão antes de fazer Então, se você fizer isso depois disso, então é sua própria culpa Você pode t fazer tudo idiota prova ou Nós ainda estaríamos batendo uns com os outros com stic Ks no woods. The recurso adverte o usuário que o cartão SD será formatado e recomenda que os usuários backup de seus dados antes de usá-lo como um armazenamento interno, e eles também recomendam contra usando o recurso se o cartão que o usuário tem é Lento Dado que é como está em estoque Android, eu não compro toda a teoria de desastres PR Com um aviso de corte claro já incluído por padrão, é a culpa dos usuários para não lê-lo beforehand. Then você está vastamente sob a classificação do nível de conhecimento Do usuário médio Os leitores deste fórum não são o usuário médio E eu garanto que se essa opção era automática, o suporte técnico da Samsung e no pessoal da loja seria inundado com pessoas que suprimiram as primeiras etapas de seu filho maior A maioria das pessoas toma o cartão sd A partir de seu telefone antigo e colá-lo na nova Neste caso, todos os dados que seria wiped. It não é automático ou Você é dado uma notificação popup na primeira vez que você inserir um cartão e pergunta-lhe de que maneira você pretende usá-lo E naturalmente usar Como o armazenamento interno vem com um aviso na descrição Se ignorado ou usuário escolher usar como armazenamento portátil, o usuário não é incomodado eo recurso permanece acessível nas configurações Talvez eu estou overrating o joe médio que don t sabe mudando lançador é uma coisa, Mas eu ainda acho a decisão da Samsung de ser ridícula Se eles queriam proteger os usuários, eles podiam escondê-lo sob as opções de desenvolvedor. A outra consideração é que eu não quero meus aplicativos e dados do app em uma mídia de armazenamento que está perto de 50 vezes mais lento do que o meu armazenamento a bordo Isso não está no tópico com o que você está dizendo Eu concordo que eles deveriam ter colocado em Opções de Desenvolvedor, mas eu pessoalmente nunca usar o recurso Demasiado compromisso de desempenho e risco potencial de falha. Como meu Atual S4 é de 16GB, 32 é uma melhoria de imediato Acho que eu ve bastante decidiu sobre o S7 para o meu upgrade. This é uma boa notícia e acalma o meu maior medo Agora eu possuo o iPhone 6s Plus 128gb como o meu pessoal eo Galaxy S6 64g B como o meu telefone de negócios tão cair para baixo para um telefone de 32GB é um grande negócio e um grande compromisso Eu prefiro memória interna sobre cartões de memória e eu gosto que meu iPhone pode armazenar todos os meus aplicativos, jogos, fotos, filmes, música e vídeos musicais Sem ser forçado a comprar um cartão de memória Esperançosamente no próximo ano Samsung traz de volta a opção de 64GB Em vez de obter o GS7 Vou tentar a Edge como o meu telefone de negócios este ano devido à bateria maior Grande artigo e obrigado pela raiz info. Just Ur dispositivo e remover aplicativos do sistema u don t need. my s mate Está recebendo 98 HOURLY na internet. two dias atrás McLaren F1 novo comprou depois de ganhar 18.512 este foi meu salário mês anterior, e-um pouco mais, 17k No mês passado 3 -5 dias de hrofworka com portas abertas extra cheques semanais é realmente o trabalho mais fácil que eu já fiz Eu me juntei Este 7 meses atrás e agora fazendo mais de 87, Mais certo Aqui o 323 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 o 323. Esperar pela notícia surpreendente da Apple, não o O telefone vai oferecer seu armazenamento padrão, 32g para o modelo de nível de entrada em 2016, inovador e à frente de seu tempo é falar que eles também inventaram uma coisa chamada gravação estéreo, e 2017 poderia ser o ano em que eles mostram uma coisa que eles chamam de Apple Roda, como uma roda normal, mas duas vezes o custo. Wow marca, um Apple bashing comentário, como original eu sei que você não tem nada grande para oferecer do que os ataques imaturos na Apple, sad. OK eu tenho que perguntar isso Por que alguém pagaria iPhone Preços para um dispositivo Android que também inclui bloatware Concordando com bloatware geralmente significa que você começa o produto mais barato Você não comprar um computador com bloatware e pagar o mesmo preço que um doesn t tê-lo Então, por que você acha que é OK para fazer com Smartphones Alguns podem dizer que você está pagando por mais especificações Bem, deixe-me apenas dizer que este dispositivos Android deve ter melhores especificações do que o iPhone para executar de forma semelhante ao iPhone em testes de benchmark Isso é porque o sistema operacional Android é muito mais poder do sistema operacional do que iOS é S O basicamente esses dispositivos Android deve ter estas especificações adicionadas para competir Se você já tentou um dispositivo Android com as mesmas especificações como um iDevice, você veria o que estou falando Não há nenhuma razão para pagar para colocar com bloatware apenas porque a Samsung tem que Gastar mais em peças para fazer seus dispositivos de desempenho semelhante ao iPhone Samsung está pagando mais dinheiro para fazer dispositivos mais caros, porque don t quer gastar o dinheiro para desenvolver seu próprio sistema operacional a partir do zero que é menos poder com fome E Tizen não é do zero É baseado no Android Se você for com mais poder do sistema operacional com fome você tem que alimentá-lo melhores especificações para executar isso é tudo o que há para it. IOS é terrível. Você claramente nunca ter possuído um iDevice ou você wouldn t ter feito esse comentário Deixe Me quebrar todas as vantagens iOS tem mais Android Segurança, Privacidade, Qualidade de Apps Jogos e estabilidade de desempenho iOS fica muito menos malware do que Android e enquanto 75 de iDevices estão no iOS 9, enquanto cerca de metade dos usuários do Android estão em KitKat Ou versões mais antigas do Android com menos de 10 dos usuários do Android no Android 6 Qualidade dos aplicativos e jogos também são melhores no iOS, porque os desenvolvedores desenvolvem os jogos de aplicativos no iOS, em seguida, porta-los para Android A razão não é só porque os desenvolvedores preferem usar C Java, mas também porque 75 de sua renda vem de iOS que inúmeros artigos apontam para ambos os fatos Também há 85 bugs mais em dispositivos Android do que dispositivos iOS Dispositivos Android congelar mais, travar mais e reiniciar mais iDevices As vantagens Reivindicação do usuário Android Android tem mais IOS são as mesmas razões que eles escolhem Android sobre iOS para começar e que s porque a maioria dos que compram dispositivos Android não pode pagar um iPhone Por exemplo, o Android pode instalar jogos de aplicativos rachados sem necessidade de jailbreak ou raiz Tudo isso significa que os usuários do Android podem t Dar ao luxo de comprar jogos aplicativos para que lado carregar os jogos de aplicativos rachados e, em seguida, pergunto por que eles acabam com malware em seu dispositivo Segunda desculpa é dispositivos Android têm cartões SD Diga Me um exemplo que você poderia ter um telefone 32 GB Android e também encher um cartão SD de 256 GB com jogos de aplicativos Isso não acontece porque metade dos dados permanece no interno É realmente melhor ter um dispositivo de 128 GB do que um dispositivo de 32 GB Com um cartão 256 SD O fato é que as pessoas tendem a comprar Android, porque eles não podem pagar um iPhone Apenas alguns poucos realmente estão dispostos a pagar os preços do iPhone para Android, portanto, por que a Samsung está sofrendo três anos consecutivos de lucros decrescentes Se as pessoas geralmente escolhem Android para Nada além de custo Android teria uma margem de lucro maior do que o iPhone não só a base de usuários mais altos, mas não Porque 99 99 dos usuários do Android comprar Android para o custo e fazer desculpas até justificar possuir um smartphone 200 mais de 650 um Também perguntar O FBI que é melhor para proteger a sua privacidade um iPhone ou um telefone Android Mesmo que o Android faz 85 do mercado, os iPhones são sempre o foco, porque os dispositivos Android são muito mais fáceis de entrar. Você não tinha fatos, apenas o seu feelin G que as pessoas só compram telefones Android porque eles supostamente mais barato. E os seus comentários desmentem um mal-entendido fundamental sobre como o Android recebe atualizações IOS usuários têm que esperar por atualizações importantes, enquanto Android recebe atualizações freqüentes através Play Services. Meanwhile, iOS foi encontrado para ser O sistema operacional móvel com a maioria das vulnerabilidades em 2015, com quase 3x tantos como Android Pathetic. The única parte verdadeira do seu comentário foi a parte sobre os desenvolvedores O resto é pura, sem suporte bollocks. Anyone que usa 99 99 do substantivo verbo porque dodgy conclusão Está falando diretamente de sua bunda. Primeiro fora há uma abundância de fatos para apoiar as pessoas só compram Android porque eles são mais baratos Você pode olhar para o preço médio as pessoas pagam por um dispositivo Android 250 em comparação com o que a pessoa média paga por um iPhone 600 Você pode olhar os lucros do smartphone onde o iPhone compõe 94 de todos os lucros globais Inferno a maioria dos usuários do Android nem sequer sabem a marca de telefone que eles têm apenas a empresa que faz I Também pode ir para salientar que a maioria dos usuários do Android que possuem orçamento Android telefones, tendem a deixar o Android para iPhone no momento em que estão atualizando para um dispositivo emblemático, este é um fato comprovado well. Secondly você re atualizações de serviço confuso com o sistema operacional real Atualizações Atualização da Google Play Store não conta como uma atualização do SO Ambos Android e iOS obter uma grande atualização a cada ano Apenas acontece que apenas 10 dos usuários do Android chegar a ver que a grande atualização antes do próximo maior é lançado enquanto 75 -80 do iOS Os usuários acabam no mais novo sistema operacional Também o Google começou mensalmente bug corrigir atualizações que também não é uma grande atualização, depois que a Apple tem feito isso por anos com o iPhone. While iOS tinha mais vulnerabilidades do que Android, Android tinha muito mais críticas vulnerabilidades críticas são O que são usados por hackers Critical Vulnerabilities e malware são os maiores problemas de segurança e qualquer pesquisador de segurança iria dizer-lhe a mesma coisa Mas eu entendo nenhuma dessas coisas favorecer o seu argumento e que yo U teve que apressar-se com todos os artigos maus de encontro ao Android e procurar algo que favorece o Android Eu posso igualmente trazer acima de que os próprios povos do Google disseram que o Android não foi projetado ser seguro E está ainda hoje que os dispositivos do Android são ainda distante mais fáceis de cortar do que IPhones. The é que eu sei mais sobre o Android eo iOS do que você faz Isso é o que é realmente triste Você é um usuário do Android, mas eu sei mais sobre o Android do que você mesmo Eu sei como root Android e Android flash eu aposto que você tem Nenhuma idéia de como fazer qualquer uma dessas coisas. Quando foi a última vez que a Google Play Store foi hackeado e mais de 85 grandes aplicativos foram infectados com malware Porque a resposta é nunca Apple não pode dizer que 21 de setembro de 2015.Este segmento está falando Sobre a Samsung dispositivo emblemático, e não um pré-pago 200 Android Samsung A empresa que faz metade dos componentes internos do seu amado IPhone, porque a Apple não é nada além de uma empresa de design de marketing muito eficaz. Vamos também dissipar esta coisa de segurança O iPhone 6 Foi jailbroken dentro de 48 horas de lançamento O Samsung S5 5 Ainda não teve acesso ao nível de raiz violado sem disparar Knox Há atualmente um 50.000 bounty não reclamado no x-dev para quem pode fazê-lo O nível de segurança em um Samsung flagship é o mesmo Como o iPhone Pensando de outra forma é pura fanboy. Let me pegar isso em linha reta em sua cabeça um incidente em que 85 apps totais foram infectados é pior do que Android que compõem 90 de todos os malwares móveis Eu vou quebrar isso para baixo mais Isso em um incidente e envolve legítimo Desenvolvedores usando uma ferramenta de terceiro partido porque o oficial era muito lento para baixar Então, basicamente, esses aplicativos eram normalmente aplicativos legítimos por desenvolvedores confiáveis Android recebe 20-40 apps desonestos por mês na Play Store Não legit apps que ficou comprometido, aplicativos rogue pura Que são permitidos em devido ao Google Aprovar todas as políticas Agora me diga o que é pior 85 infectados legit apps que são limpos e estão de volta ao normal ou ter rogue apps que continuam sendo lançados e Google manter o aplicativo Roving-los Isso é certo os rogue são piores É por isso que o Android faz até 90 de todos os malwares móveis, mesmo se você incluir esse incidente 85 app Google próprio apenas recentemente puxado 40 aplicativos rogue e antes que outros 20 Então thats 60 lá e nenhum Foram legit apps que ficou comprometido. Como para o seu argumento de segurança Android sempre foi mais difícil de raiz do que iOS tem sido a jailbreak, isso é de conhecimento comum É também conhecimento comum do que o Android é muito mais fácil de hack de IOS é Assim usando rooting vs jailbreaking Para determinar a segurança realmente não funciona Especialmente desde Android é mais vulnerável fora da caixa do que iOS é Você nem precisa de raiz Android para cortá-lo Assim enraizamento também não é necessário. Por favor, a segurança Knox é superior ao iOS É por isso que Samsung Knox dispositivos foram o segundo atrás BlackBerry para ser aprovado para o Departamento de Defesa e Departamento de Justiça use Você usa estoque Android como sua vara de medição Estou falando sobre Samsung e Knox Knox iOS. Second, Google d Oes NÃO tem uma política aprovada Todos os que é simplesmente errado É uma plataforma de desenvolvimento aberto, mas os aplicativos na Play Store são verificados por vírus, malware e spyware antes que eles são liberados. Quando você fala sobre 90, em primeiro lugar, que não é True É muito menor E você está tomando Android e globalmente onde o Android tem uma quota de mercado muito maior, então obviamente terá mais incidentes Especialmente com empresas como Heuiwei ganhando quota de mercado Mas a Samsung bloqueia isso com Knox. We sei que você deseja desligar O tema do iOS vs Android e se concentrar em Knox vs iOS porque Android vs iOS doesn t favorecer o seu lado Knox isn t um sistema operacional para que você possa t realmente compará-lo a um sistema operacional Também só porque o Departamento de Defesa aprová-lo doesn t torná-lo mais Seguro Você verá muito mais congressistas com iPhones do que com telefones Knox Hmmm por que é que também se os telefones Knox são muito mais seguros hows vêm quando se trata de criptografia e batalhas de segurança que eles nunca mencionaram Android tem um maior markethare global Se o Knox fosse mais seguro do que o iOS, então o Android e o Knox seriam colocados sob o fogo pelo governo do que o iOS direito. Então, por que o Google não está escaneando os vírus? Não é diferente do que a Apple ter que aprovar todos os apps que entram na AppStore. Diferença é muito mais aplicativos de malware torná-lo na Play Store mesmo agora do que a AppStore para a eficácia do Google suposto AV é questionável Quanto à sua falar sobre malware em si Se você só se concentrar em nós, então você pode remover os 85 aplicativos infectados iOS Do seu argumento porque isso afetou apenas os usuários chineses do Android. LMFAO sobre o comentário dos congressistas Esses caras são os maiores idiotas técnicos do planeta eu estou falando DoD e DoJ e você traz uma representação de 80 anos de idade de Podunk como sua vara de medição. Você trouxe até Por que alguém iria pagar um prêmio Android quando eles poderiam obter um iPhone no meio de uma discussão Samsung Meu mau eu pensei que você queria uma resposta Eu entendo perfeitamente por que você gostaria de orientar longe de Knox um nd focus on the great, unwashed Android masses But the fact remains that Knox is integrated in to the OS in Samsung flagship devices Knox is more secure than iOS Period Samsung s hardware is better, the OS is more dynamic and Knox makes it more secure. You can toss Android vs iOS babble around all you want But Samsung is at the forefront of technical innovation right now Apple makes a nice phone, no doubt But that superiority complex of yours is wholly unwarranted. If you had watched the congress hearing over security, you wouldn t have made the comment about the DoD and DoJ vs congressmen A lot of congressmen have worked in the tech field before becoming congressmen, they have far more expertise in tech security than the DoJ and DoD Matter of fact if you look at most attacks on tech security the DoD and DoJ pay someone else to do the attacks for them, they don t do them themselves Hell they can t even figure out how to open an iPhone 5c without Apple s help They know almost nothing abou t tech security when it comes to using it to protect the people or finding information, they pay hackers or try to force the companies themselves to do it instead Samsung hardware is again only better because Android is a slower OS, it s been proven time and again But keep trying to convince yourself that specs matter more than actual performance In the end you will need to have someone who knows how to do tech attacks not hire others to do it for them, when you re gonna use them as judge of what is secure and what isn t If they can t destroy security on mobile devices themselves, they re the last people I would use their opinion when it comes to what is secure. Ahhhaaaaahaha Yes Congress is chock full of tech geniuses Keep telling yourself that And what does hacking ability have to do with security standards The NSA advises the DoD on security standards and helps set them They adopted Knox before iOS because of how secure Knox is That was the point Jeez Try to keep up. Let me break down all the advantages iOS has over Android Security, Privacy, Quality of Apps Games and performance stability. Maybe on Android devices in general, but not vs Samsung Samsung is more secure with Knox The Knox container gives you absolute privacy Quality of apps Maybe at one time and in some niche markets like music development However, companies no longer develop strictly for iOS or even exclusively target iOS The majority of people own Android devices The app developers spend just as much time in on Android as iOS. We ve already covered performance Apple is playing catch up and has been since the iPhone 4S The only thing you can hang your hat on is profitability That because iSheep will flock to anything with that half eaten fruit on it Look at the Apple watch Crap battery life, not water resistant, ugly as hell yet sells millions But hey, it looks great with your Uggs and half caff latte. Like I said it s obvious you didn t watch hearing You also didn t read about how the DoD DoJ paid for a DDoS attack on Tor You don t follow along with anything The NSA also couldn t break into the iPhone 5c So much for their standards too Did it ever occur to you they want people with Android in general because it s easier to break into and they know most will associate Knox with Android Of course not But the fact is the government seems to think the iPhone is more secure than ANY android device, since it s mentioned more than Knox and Android when it comes to encryption and security, and you can t dispute it because it s a fact So many articles back it up. You also need to go back to benchmarks when looking at performance The iPhone 6s blew away the S6 in overall benchmarks, the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6s beat the S6 in gaming benchmarks and the iPhone 5s, 6 and iPhone 6s beat the S6 in browsing benchmarks So tell me where is this actual performance advantage of Android devices you speak of It s not showing in benchmark tests, it s not showing in stability tests either So what standard do you use to judge performance Personal opinion you wish to take as fact. I m glad you have such in depth knowledge of my background I followed the Silk Road case with that nut DPR And what those guys S waist6 the FBI and NSA did was nothing short of amazing Of course it required luck and a great deal of time But tracking a guy down who was using such great measures to conceal himself is amazing It also has absolutely NOTHING to do with what we re talking about Those same guys eventually recommended approval of iOS We re they still incompetent Of course not. The reason criminals prefer iOS is that most criminals are stupid So they choose Apple devices because they re aware of the PERCEIVED security advantage So more criminals use iOS Congratulations The fact that they aren t aware of Knox doesn t make Knox less secure You re equating popularity with better The Honda Accord is the most stolen car in the US So it s the best, right No It s just the most popular. I ll let the Geekbench test te ll they performance tale. First off it s funny how you wouldn t show how the S6 did compared to the 6s because you know the 6s is faster you instead went to the Note 5 which is newer than the 6s Didn t like the result the Galaxy S6 had did you As for security The FBI case vs Apple and this on going fight for encryption has went on since 2014 and Android is always a side note, you rarely hear Knox mentioned in any of that either When it comes to encryption and security even the government ALL branches mention iOS more than Knox and Android You hate that I know So you re gonna make excuses to justify it The reality is whether Knox is more secure than iOS for the people or not doesn t matter if the government itself has a way through it Sounds to me like Samsung gave the government the ability to disable Knox Be happy that Android companies are more willing to make their devices more vulnerable for the government thus also making them more vulnerable to hackers and other governments. Why wo uld I show the S6 vs the 6S The Note and the 6S are on the same release cycle If you really want to be unfair we could show the S7 vs the 6S. So wait, you re saying that Samsung gave the government a side door in to Knox LMAO Don t hurt your self making those ridiculous leaps in logic Full release Knox has never been breached Ever You can connect whatever ludicrous dots you see under your tin hat, but Knox is Enterprise software Samsung is never going to open a back door in business software. So now we go all the way back to your idiotic initial assertion question about why anyone would buy an Android, specifically a Samsung, when they could buy an iPhone Simple It s easily just as good if not better in almost every appreciable way Better screen, better battery life, better camera, expandable memory, water resistant That s why. First off both the S6 and 6s were released in 2015 so they are in fair comparison Matter of fact the comparison should be the S6 vs 6s and the Note 5 vs 6s Plus bu t you don t want to compare the S6 vs the 6s because you know the S6 got smoked by the 6s in benchmarks That is the only reason you don t want to compare the 2 Admit it you looked up benchmarks, saw the 6s beat the S6 and then saw the Note 5 beat the iPhone 6s and chose to use the Note 5 instead Just admit it. All I have to do is continue stating the fact that almost no one mentioned Knox when talking about security when it comes to security researchers or the government It s always about iPhones There are far more Android phones out there and I m sure there s plenty of Galaxies that the government have gotten ahold of, but seems like only the iPhones are they having issues with Why is that. My very first post never once said why would anyone buy Android, I asked why would anyone pay the same for bloatware as they would for an iPhone that doesn t There are Android devices that don t come with bloatware with as good or better features specs as the S7 So why choose the S7 over another Andr oid device of same specs features but less or no bloatware Because of the Samsung name right Makes it worth putting up with that bloatware. The iPhone 6S and the Note5 were released within a month of each other The Note5 and the S6 have the same processor The only major difference is the RAM I don t need to look up this stuff I work in the industry and know it like the back of my hand You sound like a child babbling on about admit it The point is that Samsung makes hardware and software every bit as capable as the iPhone. You make pompous claims about peerless security and are shown wrong Now you re bringing up some ridiculous anecdotal crap about who talks the most about which device as if that somehow correlates in to something significant If iOS is so secure, how come Samsung was approved before it The answer is that Knox is every bit as secure The fact that your imaginary experts aren t talking about it what does that even mean, anyway is totally irrelevant. But your original statemen t about bloatware is still just as douchy and stupid as the rest of your arguments If you buy a carrier iPhone, it has the carrier bloat on it Same with Samsung, HTC, LG, etc If you buy the unlocked version of the S6, it s just as bloat free as the non carrier version of the iPhone. Keep making up excuses that the S6 with better specs got destroyed in benchmarks by the iPhone 6s What s you re excuse it lost to the iPhone 6 in gaming benchmarks since it is newer than the iPhone 6 And please share your justification as to why the S6 is slower on browsing benchmarks to the iPhone 5s which is even older. Also the fact the iPhone is mentioned more and been proven to cause the government more issues to break into trumps any claims by the DoD that Knox is more secure The government has never been frustrated getting into an Android device whether it be an Galaxy with Knox or just Android itself Let me know when the government s actions with Knox match their claims. Oh but the iPhone doesn t come with carrier bloatware The fact you think it does shows you have never owned an iPhone I bought my iPhone from Sprint itself, not one piece of carrierware was on it This is what I mean about Android users, they have never owned an iDevice yet for some reason they think they can judge iOS based on their zero knowledge of iOS Here s facts for you based on a guy who has had both iOS and Android and from others who have actually had both not just claim it iOS is a faster OS, that s not even disputable The proof that the 6s with less specs killed the S6 in benchmarks shows that Android is less stable Android phones freezes, slowdown and reboot more often than iPhones there s even stats to back that up too The quality of apps games on iOS are also superior to the Android versions developers care more about iOS than Android thus build their apps games on iOS and port them to Android These are actual facts Matter of fact most iPhone users who switch to Android, don t stay with Android because of those things I just mentioned But I rarely see someone who has left Android for iOS go back to Android Plus if iOS users really want Android features and openness we can just jailbreak, which for the record has better tweaks than what rooted Android offers Also still more secure than most Android devices as well I personally don t need the openness of Android since I don t mind spending money on apps games I am waiting for some form of physical proof by security researchers or the government to show Knox is stronger than iOS not just a claim with no actual evidence. Oye You re exhaustively simple minded The S6 does not get destroyed by the 6S The link I posted shows the Note5 result on par with the 6S That s the same processor in the Note5 as the S6 So I m not sure where you see this destroyed thing Unless you re eating up the Boy Genius slop Then that would explain a bunch BTW, that same link shows the S7 processor mauling the 6S THAT is what destruction looks like. The fact that App le is currently involved with a high profile battle with the FBI has zero to do with the level of security in a Samsung They both use AES 256-bit ODE encryption, so how is Apple more secure. I m guilty as charged The last iPhone I owned was the iPhone 4 Company paid so I used it I thought for SURE it had carrier crap on it But apparently I m wrong That also has nothing to do with your claim that the iPhone is better Carrier subsidized Samsung has carrier bloat that s easily removed The unlocked version has none of it. I also showed you actual Geekbench 3 results Not some blowhard opinion, but actual results Where is this superiority you speak of. Stability Try again Here s the actual facts from the last conclusive tests Apparently, iOS 8 crashes slightly more often than Lollipop, having a 2 2 crash rate compared to Android 5 s 2 0 rate iOS 8 also loses when compared to the previous release iOS 7 had a 1 9 crash rate , while Lollipop beats bot KitKat and Ice Cream Sandwich, each having 2 6 crash rates That s from BGR, a notorious Apple fanboy site. So there s your actual facts Not innuendo, not suppositions, but actual facts Sorry You lose Samsung is every bit as capable as iPhone And you don t have to have a Napoleon complex to own one. Again you can t find hard evidence to state your case that Knox is more secure outside of XDA bounty and a claim from the DoD Even though the phones that the FBI are having a hard time breaking into are not Galaxy phones Also the fact the XDA bounty was only 50,000 compared to the iOS one that was a million bounty should tell you the security level difference 50,000 Knox bounty, 1,000,000 iOS bounty hmmm. Weird this says Android devices make up for 85 of all smartphone crashes and it s from this year. Don t know if you hate Android or what but here are my thoughts and I m sure some Android users would agree on. Price is a huge factor if I can get 80-90 of the functionality of a flagship phone for half the price why not Pretty easy decision f or those looking for maximum value. Don t get me wrong, I don t hate Apple I own an iPad air 2 Why Because it was cheaper The only other comparable Android tablet of the same size at the time was the xperia z tablets and it was like 5-600 So yeah price is a huge factor especially since the functionality is pretty much the same between the two OS. A lot of the Android fans probably have not used ios devices in past few years I know ios has improved a lot because I own a device, but ios was pretty bad until like ios 7 could be 6, can t remember Prior to that the OS multitasking wasn t even a thing on ios so Android was seen as the more powerful OS Now they re pretty even in terms of software capabilities. Now for a phone I chose Android If I could get a device that was cheaper and provide a more fun experience, why not I say more fun because I personally love how I can tweak much more than ios Even small things like animations I can also customize it much more Make it more personal The only way iphones look personalized is the case if you use one and the wallpapers With Android you can customize much more launchers, widgets, Roms, app drawer, etc Oh and you can change the ROM Sometimes you get bored, flash a new ROM and the fun starts all over again. Customization doesn t end in software There are hundreds or thousands of Android phones for you to choose from Each with their own design and hardware You don t have to choose from two sizes. It s a sacrifice that s worth making for many of us More security issues or what not Google is providing monthly security updates now and Samsung has knox not sure how effective it is I personally havent had any issues OS updates are an issue Some manufacturers may start to move to off contract, off carrier sales like moto and roll out faster updates Having updates to go through carriers is such pain I also agree on the bloatware issue I personally go for the near stock phones like moto, nexus, or flash cyanogen. Also they re huge Dangerou s 94 of market profit Their moves can have massive impact in tech industry I don t like that One call from Tim Cook and I would need to use an adapter to plug in my 3 5mm headphones for the 7 If they make that move I will hate them forever companies will follow because of their massive influence. I actually don t have an issue with Android itself Matter of fact my initial post was more a question about just one smartphone I actually had an Android phone before I had an iPhone I had a Motorola Cliq which came out before the first Droid phone The reason I left Android is because I could not see a reason to pay a premium price to get less performance My iPod Touch 2G got more updates than my Cliq even though it was older Games ran smoother on my iPod Touch than my Cliq as well There s just something wrong when an older device runs better and does better with games than a newer device I actually got a Kindle Fire 5G, and it s so much slower than my iPhone 6 Plus, I actually haven t used it in over a month As for profit Android companies have themselves to blame for this They try to put their flagship devices in a price range most Android users just aren t willing to pay And flagship devices are where companies make their money Samsung could double their smartphone profits by selling their S7 for 450 as it would not only get some budget users to choose their flagship instead but also may get some iPhone users to go with Android to save money But Samsung is determined to sell Android at iPhone prices, and it s just not gonna work As for the headphones thing I don t mind needing an adapter for my Bose headphones IF it means better quality internal speakers And rumor is they will use that extra space to add another speaker so that might be a good compromise. So your two points of reference in comparing the Apple and Android ecosystems are a phone from 6 years ago before Android even began to become popular and a recent Android tablet that you re comparing to an apple product that cost about six times as much. And now your premise is that the galaxy s7 and edge offer less performance than the iPhone offerings. Your original question was fine and the answer is because the other features of the phone outweigh the negative of the bloatware for the people who choose to purchase it I hate Touchwiz but this offering from Samsung ticked enough other boxes that I chose to buy it despite that. I think that the premise that Android flagship phones offer less performance than iPhones is false I can understand why people would value some features more than others and in that regard, that is no wrong choice but to argue that performance is flat out worse in all aspects just seems incredibly closed-minded. If you don t believe me about performance Look at how the iPhone 6 did against the S6 in gaming benchmarks The S6 is newer than the iPhone 6 yet it got smoked on gaming benchmarks Also The S6 lost to the 6s in normal benchmarks And even the iPhone 5s beat the S6 when it ca me browsing benchmarks So what do you go by to determine performance if those things don t I also know the iPhone 7 will beat the Galaxy S7 in benchmarks because the newest iPhone beats the Galaxy every single year. We weren t talking about the S6, we were talking about the S7.You re defining performance as one very specific area I m talking about everything upon which a phone can be measured Processor, camera, storage, OS features, other hardware features, screen size etc And benchmarks don t really matter to me if the end experience is nearly identical The camera on the S7 is better The processor is faster There s more RAM It has removable storage Samsung pay works with regular swipe card readers These are all areas in which the S7 arguably surpasses the iPhone There are other areas and considerations where the iPhone surpasses the S7 and when the new iPhone is released in many months, it will probably perform better But right now, to claim that the current crop of iPhones perform bet ter than the S7 in all areas is really just disingenuous. Yes, the next iPhone will probably surpass the S7 in some or most or even all of these areas but that s several months of tech development later and then the next iteration of the Galaxy will be several months of development after that and they continue to leapfrog each other. At this point, it doesn t sound like you re asking an honest question if you re incapable of believing anyone s response Why are you even posting to this forum if you refuse to accept or acknowledge people s answers to your questions. Processor and RAM only matter if it makes the phone faster and more stable Do you realize the S5 had better specs than the iPhone 6s yet wasnt faster or as stable As for the Camera argument, Android users used to act like the camera didn t matter because their excuse when the iPhone camera was better is people who care about picture quality use an actual camera not a phone Now all the sudden cameras in phones matter When the iPh one ends up with better picture quality rest assured Android users will go back to picture quality on a camera doesn t matter And I believe answers from people who have used both iOS and Android not ones who give their opinion from one side and act like Android is better cause of it I ve owned both Android and iOS so I know both sides I also follow benchmarks and all articles involving iOS, Android and Windows mobile because it s plain dumb to focus only on one aspect or one OS. Owning and using an Android phone from 6 years ago and a tablet that you compare to another device that costs over 6 times as much doesn t sound like knowing both sides very well But that aside, in a discussion about the Galaxy S7, a new device, why do you insist on talking about other devices that are one or two generations old You re talking and asking about the S7 but continually keep bringing up the S5 and S6 as examples of phones that weren t as good They probably weren t The S6 was a step down as far as I m concerned and Touchwiz on the S5 lagged terribly which is why I wasn t interested in them The S7 from all reviews doesn t seem to have any of those problems, brought back the features from the S5 that were removed, improved on them and added several new ones. And you don t believe that there s a single feature on the S7 that is better than the iPhones currently available SD card Samsung pay Several other people do and they ve explained as such If you simply don t believe them then there s no further reason to continue You re not going to convince them and you seem unable to accept that this might be a device that performs better in some, or even many aspects that an iPhone that s six months old Personally, I believe that the camera is not only better but much better Several review sites put the cameras on the current crop of flagship Android phones at or above the camera on the iPhone 6 The S6 edge is pretty consistently rated at or above the iPhone 6s and the camera on the S7 looks w ay better Samsung has a pretty good history making some of the best cameras available on phones and the includes iPhones Maybe the next iPhone will have an even better camera It s entirely possible But I m willing to bet that the camera on the S7 is better, particularly in low light, than that of the iPhone 6s. As far as cameras not mattering, there s a saying among photographers The best camera to use is the one that s with you At this point, camera phones outperform point and shoots until you start getting to the 400 price point Yes, I would obviously rather have my SLR with a prime lens of the appropriate focal length attached to take a picture, but it s far more likely that I ll have my phone when any given photo opportunity arises This has been true for years and will likely continue to be true Anyone who says or said differently is wrong. I actually have a Kindle Fire as well But you know the odd thing is most on here while they tell me I should try Android now to compare, they hav e never once owned an iDevice So they re basically telling iPhone users to try Android without willingness to try iOS, kinda defeats the purpose don t you agree Plus I have mentioned in one of my posts my sis owned an S5 and yes I have used it, it is far slower than my iPhone 6 Plus is especially when it comes to how it handles data in areas of weak coverage. I never said that the S7 didn t have better features than the iPhones currently out I m not sure how you can say Samsung Pay is better than Apple Pay though seeing as Apple Pay is more secure than Samsung Pay is It s also more widely used than Samsung Pay is SD Card I have brought up on multiple occasions that it would be useful IF you could install apps games directly to the SD Card I also know Android 6 allows for this but Samsung decided not to allow that feature in the S7 I honestly think the G series by LG are the best Android phones, Samsung is just an overhyped brand that never actually does as it s expected compared to othe r top Android flagship brands BTW LG G5 does allow for install on SD card and I will definately take a long hard look over it when it s time to upgrade I almost got a G3 instead of my iPhone 6 Plus It was a real fight for me on that What made me end up choosing the iPhone over the G3 was design and the fact I don t want to risk plopping down 600 for a smartphone that may or may not getting 2 years of updates. And yes photographers say that but Android users only took that seriously when some Android phones surpassed the iPhone in quality That said while the S6 did have better picture quality than the iPhone 6s is wasn t THAT much better that you could say this is so much better Tests have shown in general that the G series actually takes the best pictures No Samsung fanboy wants to go into that conversation though Also if you haven t noticed most photographers still use iPhones as their phone of choice for pictures iPhones are the perferred smartphone of professionals whether it be doct ors, photographers or even businesses Hell Donald Trump tells people to boycott Apple products but he still tweets with an iPhone Hell some people at Samsung have tweeted on an iPhone as well as a head of Microsoft and someone at BlackBerry Makes you wonder if they really believe their own products are as good as the iPhone if they re using the iPhone instead of their own phones they create to tweet with. The Kindle Fire is the tablet that I referenced where you compared it to an iPhone 6 I don t know why you insist on arguing what other Android users have said in the past It not really relevant to what either I m saying now or your original questions I do agree that it s hypocritical to say that one side should try the other without being willing to do so onesself but that s a straw man and irrelevant to boot And again with the previous generation of Galaxy phones who cares, they had their issues but the S7 is a different model It d be like me going on about the antennae issues on a pr evious generation of iPhone It s irrelevant But since you seem to care, I owned a 3rd generation iPod nano and my mom has an iPhone 6s that I provide tech support for so I guess I can say I ve experience on both sides. There isn t much left to say but one thing to note about the SD on the S7 is that even though it s not adaptable storage, you can move apps or at least part of the apps to the SD card That s a pleasant surprise for me though I was happy with the SD just for picture and video. LG does take great pictures and it s really subjective on whether any given LG camera is better than a corresponding Samsung camera They each have situations where they ll take a better picture over the other so it s really up to personal preference I m optimistic that the F1 7 lens combined with the larger pixels on the S7 sensor will take better low light pictures without flash which is something I tend to value more than other aspects Its why I primarily shoot with a 50 1 4 fixed lens on my SLR wit h no flash If someone else is looking for better resolution in sunny situations, they d probably be better served with a G5.And as I ve pointed out on many of my other comments, moving to SD card is not putting all storage on your SD Card A Kindle Fire I can use as an example 8 GB internal with 256 GD SD does not equal 264 GB of storage unless 90 of your SD card is used for stuff like downloaded music or videos Matter of fact you will be lucky to get 16 GB of stuff onto that SD card before your internal is full and won t let you use your SD card because of it What I m also saying is if you use Gaming Benchmarks or browser Benchmarks, the newer Android devices don t even fair well against older iPhones The Galaxy S6 couldn t even beat out the iPhone 6 in gaming The Galaxy S6 couldn t beat out the 5s in browsing So in some ways older iPhones can out perform newer Android devices Another bonus to iPhones is trade in value As for the why I insist on arguing, My very first comment was a que stion and someone else had to say iOS sux without giving a reason I was merely curious as to why someone would pay 500 or more for a smartphone that has bloatware from carriers when you can buy a device that has no carrierware at the same price like an iPhone I just don t understand paying for ads which is basically what youre doing. You do understand that the Samsung S6 and S7 are technically superior phones to the iPhone 6 and 6S, right Why would they undercut themselves It s the most popular Android device by far and not everyone wants to be led down the Apple cattle shoot. You re basing your Android experience on a phone that s more than 5 years old when Android was in its infancy BTW, look at numbers of who is moving to which device More new Android users are former iOS users than new iOS users are former Android users. You should look at how many former FLAGSHIP smartphone users have moved from iOS to Android and Android to iOS Using total numbers is an excuse since most iOS users w ho leave for Android usually go with a budget phone because they no longer can afford a flagship one Ask Samsung themselves because they see far more Android users leaving Galaxy for iPhone than the other way around As for your superior argument Do you realize Android devices have to have to have more specs to perform equally to iOS because Android is a more power hungry OS Look at benchmarks The Galaxy S5 had more specs than the iPhone 6 yet the iPhone 6 performed better Hell in gaming benchmarks, the iPhone 6 beat the Galaxy S6 In browsing benchmarks even the iPhone 5s beat the Galaxy S6.Don t know if you hate Android or what I m not a hater of Android, I actually had an Android phone before my first iPhone I just hate Android users who insult things without giving a reason why. Price is a huge factor if I can get 80-90 of the functionality of a flagship phone for half the price why not I have no issue with people choose devices based on price I have issues with people who choose devi ces based on price then go after those who have more expensive devices. Also they re huge Dangerous 94 of market profit Apple s influence in general is a good thing as they are pushing for security for the people The headphone adapter I can live with if it means better sounding internal speakers like rumors are going around. Whose security is better Samsung Knox or iOS. The problem with all this is Android users who use Knox tend to go strictly by rooting vs jailbreaking as the determination of security Even though Android has always been harder to root than iOS has been to jailbreak yet Android is easier to hack than iOS, Android users still rely on jailbreaking vs rooting Also most Android users assume that Knox and Google protect them so they don t use top notch AntiVirus They assume Knox and Google do all the work Google may scan for malware but it doesn t remove all malware Knox has zero AntiVirus built into it, absolutely none So answer your question, I would still lean toward iOS b ecause Android users have not given any evidence Knox is more secure outside of jailbreaking and rooting for their argument with security I don t see any reports that show a lower percent of Knox devices are hacked or have a lower percent of malware Until there are actual security reports to back these claims up they re only claims. Of the devices I ve owned that were rootable, I ve rooted every one. Here s the thing some Android devices never get root, and many more take months before a suitable exploit is found My Droid Turbo, for example, didn t see root until a year after release. By contrast, new versions of iOS are jailbroken WITHIN HOURS of release. Nothing else needs to be said here. I can afford the iphone maybe just 16 and 64 gb but I chose not to get one because I find it boring and lacking features and i admit I personally don t like the hype and popularity surrounding it Sure it s a great phone and very straightforward, effective, and simplistic, but I prefer android. I ve never dealt with security issues or malware. IMO, My s5 is way better than the iPhone 6s in terms of features Sure the iphone beats it in certain categories, but I get sdcard, removable battery, water resistance, an amazing amoled screen, lots of little features like multiwindow, customization without having to root, widgets, and maybe more. To each his own though. S6 did away with the removable battery and the S7 continues that Removable battery is a nice feature to have except for most people, you re gonna upgrade before you need a new battery so in most cases the removable battery is more a gimmick The SD card would be useful if you could install apps games to the SD card not just move them to the SD Card The biggest issue with the S5 is how it handle data in areas with spotty service My sis has an S5 and we went on a trip together to a place where our service just isn t good We both have Sprint Anyways my iPhone 6 Plus had signal far more often than she did She actually kept asking me to l ook things up because her phone always had no LTE or even 3G, it was out of service most of the time. You compleyely ignore the fact that you can put hundreds of gigs of media on multiple SD cards and swap them out You can carry a terabyte on just 5 cards Can t do that with an iPhone. Because that excuse doesn t work anymore Most people now stream music and movies thus making the media SD Card argument a moot point You re prolly one of those guys who illegally downloads things and stores it onto an SD Card because you either can t afford to pay for anything or are too cheap to pay for anything. I don t believe that at all I don t know anyone who streams movies on their data plan Not at 15 a gig once you go over your cap. Hahaha did you just make up those number off the top of your head Like you know there are EXACTLY 85 more bugs in Android devices That sounds like terrorist-protector Cook saying that so many iphones are being bought by people switching from Android yet somehow Apple iphon e shipments declined the last quarter and Android still has a commanding market share Something doesn t add up, Mr Cook Keep saying that Android users can t afford iphones It won t make your small dick any bigger While Android caters to all price levels, there are plenty of Android users who pay just as much for their flagship Samsungs, LG s, HTC s, Sony s, Motorola s, etc I wouldn t use that toy OS if I was given an iphone for free I m glad Apple finally figured out that if I opened up a link from an email that I might want to go back to the email app after reading the link without having to double tap the home button and switch back to it Who thought it was a great idea to have the back button in Safari on the bottom but on the top of virtually every other system app setting Thank god Android has a back button Anyway, go back to your elite phone that only 15 of people can afford Maybe one day you ll be as elite as Windows Phone and be part of the 1.Well if you actually looked things up you would know my numbers may be a percent or so off but they are facts The fact you commented without looking says everything That s the issue with Android users, they respond without looking anything up. I find it odd that you KNOW Robert didn t look up any of your facts Perhaps he did, and he could not substantiate them it appears he replied 2 hours after your comment so I just started with googling android bugs to ios and the first 5 hits are all about how ios9 could be pushing iphone users to android because it s so buggy I admit, I skimmed the articles because I am just looking for some references to the bug you stated And, I have not yet changed my search criteria, but I am still looking You could make it easier by perhaps posting the sources I d be interested to read them, especially on the bug count, of course. Android accounts for 85 of all device failures. Thanks, I ll have to download the Blannco report, because BGRs coverage is missing some details Others citing the report lead with the fact that 75 of the issues are not actual hardware or software problems, but user issues such as apps running in the background, batteries damaged from unnecessary charging, etc PC Mag cites The Blancco study analyzed an unknown number of smartphones and tablets that underwent diagnostics testing on the SmartChk platform but another article cites millions Both troubling if Blannco did not break down the study group Questions arise such as, how many devices were tested was it indeed millions or at least significant , was the study group balanced, or did it reflect market share, etc I m also having trouble finding the app itself on google play it was on itunes , so I m not sure how they are getting their android stats unless certain carriers are using the app in store for diagnostics. Their own site does show it does offer their service on both Android and iOS But they don t list a download link on the site for either So I m not sure if you have to have them do the diagnost ic test which if that is the case, I can see carriers using on returned phones that need repairs I can also see it used by services like Gazelle who buy them used then resell them It doesn t sound like they go back actual users opinions Which is good because users themselves actually complain about smallest things iOS users for instance will complain merely about a change even if it has zero affect on performance If it s something they don t like they complain They have a right to though because they spent 600 or more on their smartphone When you spend that kinda money you expect more for your money than someone who spends 200 Do you know one of the biggest reasons those who switch from Android to iOS miss most Quality of Apps and Games They love the features of Android but they tend to have a hard time looking past the apps games thing The second thing I hear mentioned is the performance like how frequently their Android device freezes compared to how often their iPhone did. Ok, got th e report, and it does not include any more information that would address concerns with their survey They do not cite how the survey group is broken down, how or if the survey size was normalized for market or user share the data came from their SmartChk app They mention the study group was gathered from millions of devices, but again, no breakdown or grouping details They state that 75 of all issues are user issues not the actual device or software , yet they do not state whether their claim of 85 android 15 iOs represents the remaining 25 that could be categorized as real issues Their approach on this study appears to be a sales piece, so you can see the correlations to how they would pitch their product They even give suggestions on resolving some of the top issues, such as battery over-charging Quote Stop over-charging the battery Users tend to excessively charge smartphones and tablets more than necessary This tends to reduce the battery s shelf life Users must remember that the b attery is designed to work for 500 full charging cycles full charging cycle means it has charged from zero percent to 100 percent Instead, a device should only be charged if there is 25 percent battery power left on it Their suggestion is not relevant to the problem because if you only use say 10 of your battery each day, you do not use a full charging cycle for 10 days assuming lithium based batteries, of course Needless to say, I would question the validity of their survey without some responses to these call outs. I don t need to look it up because I can spot BS when I read it Why waste my time looking up something that doesn t exist I ve already wasted enough time replying to your ignorant post Since you were the one who made the claim, it s your responsibility to supply your reference or just admit you made it up Breaking news Apple and Tim Cook protect 100 more terrorists than Google Look it up I read it on the internet so it must be true. The fact you wouldn t bother looking it up says everything You are a typical Android user purely opinionated with no facts and no willingness to look things up before commenting Also I guess you weren t aware of Google backing Apple in this FBI vs Apple case So I guess they support terrorism just as much as Apple they just don t know how to make an OS as secure as iOS You re prolly also not aware that Samsung spoke out about it too and sides with Apple Wow everyone supports Apple except the people who don t follow along and just form an opinion instantly It s all these others who stated facts on here about Android, I didn t force them to confirm it, I looked up what they said to validate it You won t because you want to believe what you want and even I did post the link you would say it was a lie because you want to believe your own way which has been obvious. Seriously dude, there s no point in looking up your numbers because they are all made up in that fantasy that takes place in your brain Just like all those numbers that y ou spout out on every Android article on Softpedia I don t know how you have time to even use your easily hackable iphone with all the time you spend trolling Android news sites Do you seriously think I m going to take anything you say seriously when you say things like 99 99 of Android users buy Android for cost and make excuses up to justify owning a 200 smartphone over a 650 one That stat sounds totally legit As far as the FBI vs Apple case, I know all about it I support the FBI s request for Apple to hack the PARTICULAR phone that was owned by a KNOWN TERRORIST AND KILLER if they are able to do so I don t support any request to create a universal backdoor that can be used at any time Answer this question If a member of your family was kidnapped and the kidnapper dropped their locked iphone and the police found it and wanted Apple to hack into it to see if it would help located your missing loved on, would you support or be against that Would you just say Oh well, I value the concep t of privacy too much to ask Apple to do such a thing Fortunately, since iphones have been exposed now as easily hackable, it wouldn t be a problem or moral dilemma for you Apple OWNED. Matt you need to get your facts straight Android is much more stable than iPhone and apparently the camera on Android is better too. I move apps to my SD card on my Galaxy S5, but it doesn t help with the storage issue My photos still show up as using phone memory, unless I pull the card out and most apps still use some of your phones memory, even after being put on the SD card It is also a pain in the A to move every app you download I still love my Galaxy and plan to get the 7 edge, but I wanted to clear up the misconception of you truly having more storage. Something must be wonky here I have a 16GB S5 with 9GB of pictures on a microSD card and those photos aren t affecting my internal phone storage at all I have over 9 GB of app and system data alone on the internal storage Cache data and miscellaneous files use another 4GB Still have over 3GB free Bottom line, external pictures shouldn t also use internal memory. Not satisfied because SD storage is slower and concessions shouldn t have to be made for that expensive of a device, especially when there s an option readily available built into the OS that was disabled by the manufacturer Not acceptable. If the option you are referring to is the adoptable storage I don t think that makes anything faster It would still be restricted by the speed of the sd storage. Thanks for this post It helped me to decide tonight to cancel the order for the 32 GB Galaxy S7 Edge and just hold out for the 64 GB version, that I m sure will be available in a few months Silly that they didn t offer it out of the gate. Can someone tell me if the 200 gb SD card for sale on Amazon will work for 4K video or just 1080p on down. I highly doubt it moves the bulk of the big apps to SD card It probably moves the apk, dex, and lib files to SD only which has been native in android the Kit Kat way forever But the internal app data and obb files which is where 90 of big games data lives, has to stay on the data partition unless you symlink to an SD card partition with same format Read about how link2SD app on play store works to understand what the Android 6 0 merging of SD card and internal storage is based on that the S7 has disabled in its fork of Android. Yeah, that s a pretty good thing actually Good for them to implement To be fair, Android by itself does take up a bit more space in Marshmallow On my Nexus 6, I can t push a new edit onto the phone without moving some apps out of the System folder on the new Marshmallow builds The reasoning is that the System partition has gotten a bit too full So add Marshmallow bloat to another UI layer, surprise. I thought every phone did this lol. Because my computer is for work and skyrim with 4k textures, my phone is for angry birds and making phone calls There is no realistic advantage to having fast storage in a phone, at least for me. You just proved my point though You re using an SSD for increased performance, just like I am I can t put my OS on a mechanical HDD anymore because it s unbearably slow, even in RAID0.You do want faster NAND flash Once you upgrade, you ll know what I mean when you try to use your M8 again Everything takes longer Obviously, apps that stay in RAM run at the speed of RAM, so no improvement will be seen It s when apps are loaded into RAM, updated in the Play Store, when reading writing large data files game data, large videos, etc , and loading heavy websites, that you ll begin to notice. By the time SD cards of today start to feel slow, then we will have new soc s that support the fast SD cards Again, ssd s sport much larger performance gains compared to hdd s than flash does to sd cards, at least in my experience If you feel like paying 200 for minimal amounts of storage on your phone be my guest I ll gladly spend that on a ssd, but not for my phone. Also, a ssd in a computer is far more noticeable in terms of performance than fast flash storage is in a phone, I know this because my iPhone 6s didn t really feel faster despite having the fastest flash speed available on the market compared to my m8.Except you had a Galaxy S6 and OOPS No SD Card Genius Samsung, genius. This is not reply to above, as much as reply to article. This we can move app to SD is not true for many large apps and games, practically all that download lot of data after first start Those apps store their own data on internal Android obb or Android data, and those hundreds of MB per app do NOT move to external SD when you use move app So you end up with moving only small part of such app to external SD. Unless they changed how they do that on S7 which I doubt , ability to move apps to external SD will NOT always save you enough space. You are totally right I have galaxy s7 edge, and when I tried to transfer game which size is about 2GB it transfered just several hundreds MB Would be much better to have bigger internal memory than putting micro sd which no have no point of moving programs Why they can t create clean full transferring. If Samsung offers 64GB or even 128GB I would not hesitate to choose Galaxy S7 Edge over Nexus 6P Having an option of expandable microSD with only 32GB internal storage is useless since you will have a lot of technical issues when you move apps to microSD. I am currently using 128GB Nexus 6P I insert 200GB microSD into USB-C microSD adapter and connect it into my Nexus 6P for movie, music and photos 128GB internal 9and 200GB extra external to use work so beautifully for me. Until Samsung releases 64GB or even 128GB internal, I will stay with Nexus 6P or 7 that will be released this year. The only thing I hate about Nexus 6P is fingerprint sensor on the back. Indeed and they should acquire a cheaper phone but the beauty is tmobile jump on demand can put these expensive computers in the hands of more people without breaking the bank. Isn t th is just one of the marshmallow features At least I thought I remembered reading something about this, in addition to adoptable storage. I m a bit confused too From what I gather, moving apps to SD for portable storage is no longer a native Android feature and has been superseded by adoptable storage, which isn t mandatory for 3rd party OEMs. Therefore it s up to the OEM to decide whether then want to implement Portable storage with Apps2SD as Samsung has done Portable storage without Apps2SD worst case scenario, not sure who does this Adoptable storage implemented in Moto X Pure Droid 2 Turbo. Adoptable storage will merge your internal storage with your SD, so your internal storage will be 32gb SD space There ll be no distinction between them. What is shown in this post is the good and old move to SD that has been present since ICS or GB It only moves some part of the app to the SD. That might be a better idea than Adoptable Storage for the average folks Less confusion. Me personally, I d be fine Currently my 6p I ve only used 10GB. Yes That s better Is there a noticeable difference in speed opening the apps from the microSD card vs internal storage. i would say it really depends on the app and the sd card. it s technically slower especially compared to UFS 2 but for most apps, i can t really see it being an issue provided you re using a fast SD card. I have two microSD cards waiting for the S7 edge The first one is a UFS-3, Class 10 64GB microSD card I ll use that one for 4K video recording, if I ever need to record in 4K The second one is a UFS-1, Class 10 200GB microSD card That ll be my main one for the phone for photos, apps, HD video, music, etc. i have a UFS-3 64gb card i m going to use i figure 96GB of space should be plenty, if i need more space, by then prices will have dropped and speeds will have gone up. i m pretty sure either of those cards should work fine with little to no real noticeable slowdown. Tried it on sd card and internal with insta and clash of clans an d didn t notice a real difference in load time to open the app That s not scientific or anything but I don t think it makes a real difference. I am fed up with pre-loaded bloatware I think I may be done with Samsung and will look seriously at the next Nexus device. You are wrong there In the past up to S5 that I checked , it moved core app files to SD, but problem was that those core files are small ones usually app itself If that app download lot of data AFTER it is started, that data remains to internal SD mostly in Android obb and Android data folders. In other words, for most large games that download hundreds of MB after first start, you will move only 10 of game to external SD, and all those hundreds of MB will remain on internal storage. TLDR move app to external SD may move only small part of app to external and keep MOST of large app on internal SD. Would u happen to know an app that can multi-select apps to move to SD card Clean Master has a feature that uninstalls or force closes multiple apps with minimal user interaction. Link2SD can batch move apps to SD, aside from it s main root-required feature make symlinks and move the apps to an external SD hidden partition kinda like a make-shift adoptable storage. Yikes One of the reasons I won t buy a Samsung device They ve made impressive devices so far this year though. So if you can move apps but not delete why cant you move them to the SD card and then format it to erase them. About Droid Life. Well, sometimes it is really useful to make averaging in the software, especially in cases when you use one or several analog values in calculation and then result of calculation is used elsewhere in the software In that case it is really nice to have function for averaging What I use is exponential averaging This method is mainly used in electronics and it is basically the same what RC filter does Please look at the following links. Also you can find nice discussion in Siemens forums here. Searching over the internet also give s a lot of results of how to implement this method I have created special function in LAD for execute exponential smoothing and it works like a charm. Last edited by Darius at 2 2 2017 9 10 07 AM. You can implement MAV very easily and in an efficient way The pseudocode is below. PULSE is a one-shot pulse which trigger AI acquisition. INIT F FirstScan Fill AIBuffer, AIValue Sum AIValue AIBufferLength Average AIValue. Calculation - called at fixed interval IF Pulse Temp AIBuffer AIPointer AIBuffer AIPointer AIValue Sum Sum AIValue-Temp Average Sum AIBufferLength if AIPointer AIBufferLength AIPointer 0.AIBuffer is array which cover period of your avwerage, indexed from 0 to Length-1 AIPointer is an int variable STAT which points to last processed element Sum is a REAL STAT variable which holds current Sim Average is a REAL STAT which gives your averaged input. This way it will not consume too much PLC time - it is much faster than making sums in every scan. I use the moving average to detect high noise on thermocouples input in heating application the noise is present when TC is dirty and makes bad contact with the workpiece. Last edited by Piotr M at 2 2 2017 9 18 45 AM. Thank you Piotr M.- What is Fill AIbuffer, AIraw - I guess you mean IF firstscan - So I shuld make this Firstscan in the calculation IF-sentence such that i just get a value when the first calculation is done Check out the bold text belo w. IF Pulse firstscan 1 Temp AIBuffer AIPointer AIBuffer AIPointer AIValue Sum Sum AIValue-Temp Average Sum AIBufferLength if AIPointer AIBufferLength AIPointer 0.You can implement MAV very easily and in an efficient way The pseudocode is below. PULSE is a one-shot pulse which trigger AI acquisition. INIT F FirstScan Fill AIBuffer, AIValue Sum AIValue AIBufferLength Average AIValue. Calculation - called at fixed interval IF Pulse Temp AIBuffer AIPointer AIBuffer AIPointer AIValue Sum Sum AIValue-Temp Average Sum AIBufferLength if AIPointer AIBufferLength AIPointer 0.AIBuffer is array which cover period of your avwerage, indexed from 0 to Length-1 AIPointer is an int variable STAT which points to last processed element Sum is a REAL STAT variable which holds current Sim Average is a REAL STAT which gives your averaged input. This way it will not consume too much PLC time - it is much faster than making sums in every scan. I use the moving average to detect high noise on thermocouples input in heating application the noise is present when TC is dirty and makes bad contact with the workpiece.- What is Fill AIbuffer, AIraw. There is SFC21 FILL instruction which you can use.-I guess you mean IF firstscan. YES You need generate firstscan bit which is one for 1st scan of OB1 after PLC start. if First Scan is True do the Init Otherwise skip it. First Scan Generation. in OB100 Po wer-up OB set First Scan Bit to True. in LAST NETWORK of OB1 reset first scan bit to False. The posted code is a pseudocode i e how to do things You will need write it with. a proper SCL symtax i e. What is Fill AIbuffer, AIraw. There is SFC21 FILL instruction which you can use That Fill instruction is not supported to my cpu s7-1200 it says I tried fillblk instead It needs 3 parameters to the function and not 2 as we are using now. FILLBLK Byte, Uint, Byte It needs IN, COUNT and OUT. Have we missed anything here It looks like FILLBLK does not support arrays.-I guess you mean IF firstscan. YES You need generate firstscan bit which is one for 1st scan of OB1 after PLC start. if First Scan is True do the Init Otherwise skip it Check code at the bottom. First Scan Generation. in OB100 Power-up OB set First Scan Bit to True. in LAST NETWORK of OB1 reset first scan bit to False. Check image the Reset is now moved to the end of OB1 btw Is it sufficient. The posted code is a pseudocode i e how to do things Y ou will need write it with. a proper SCL symtax i e.
No comments:
Post a Comment